| CONGRESSMAN FRANK PALLONE, JR. Sixth District of New Jersey | |
|
Special Order Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance | |
| December 5, 2001 | |
| Mr. Speaker, I'm concerned about recent statements made by one of my colleagues, Rep. Dan Burton, about India. We will soon be voting on the Foreign Operations Appropriations bill. We will be providing very limited aid to India, the world's largest democracy and our strong friend in the politically unstable South Asia region. Rep. Burton recently made critical statements to the press about India in an effort to persuade Members to not provide aid to India or to resume sanctions against India. He specifically referenced the Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO) and states that it was the most repressive law that India has ever considered. Mr. Speaker, for the past 50 years, India has been forced to deal with severe cross-border terrorism in Kashmir and an upsurge of terrorist attacks throughout their nation. Since the September 11th attacks here in the U.S., India has experienced heightened terrorism in Kashmir and quite frankly, I?ve been reading about murders of innocent Kashmiris by Islamic militants on nearly a daily basis. Just this morning, I read about two new incidents that occurred yesterday. Suspected terrorists shot and killed a judge in Kashmir, along with his friend and two guards. This is the first attack on the judiciary of Jammu&Kashmir state. The other incident was a suicide squad of a Pakistani-based guerrilla group that killed at least five people at an Indian army camp in Kashmir. This latest suicide attack is to be added to a long series of suicide attacks that have killed many innocent Kashmiris. As a result of violent terrorist attacks against India, the Indian President has issued the Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO). POTO would make provisions for Indian law enforcement officials to prevent and deal with terrorist activities. The current criminal justice system in India is not sufficient in prosecuting terrorists and with passage of POTO, India will be provided the necessary law enforcement tools to prevent and effectively deal with terrorism. Mr. Speaker, I am not suggesting that Rep. Burton or anyone else should not be able to speak out against POTO, if they desire. India is a vibrant democracy with an open political system. Its free press and democratic nature allows all voices and opinions to be heard. But I think the criticism is undeserved. I'd like to draw an analogy between what?s happening with POTO in India and what's happening with the Provide Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (PATRIOT) in the US. This analogy was conveniently overlooked by my colleague from Indiana. | |
|
| |
|
Home | Contact | Biography | District | Constituent Services Press | Committees/Leadership | Legislation |
|
Statement List | ![]() |