Statement of Chairman Joel Hefley and Ranking Minority Member Alan B. Mollohan on Their Determinations Regarding the Conduct of Representative Karen McCarthy
Late
last year we commenced fact-gathering under Committee Rule 18(a) regarding news
media reports that Representative Karen McCarthy had used campaign funds to pay
for a trip to
While
Representative McCarthy, through counsel, made a number of submissions to us asserting
that her use of campaign funds to pay the expenses of that trip was proper, she
failed to provide information we requested regarding the activities other than
attendance at the Grammy Awards in which she engaged while in
However, to date she has failed to make the required repayment or even to state her intention to do so. Normally such disregard of Committee determinations by a Member would warrant the initiation of a formal disciplinary proceeding against the Member. After careful consideration, we have decided, for two reasons, not to recommend that the Committee initiate such action.
First, Representative McCarthy will be departing the House at the end of this Congress. In view of the timing of this matter, and the various time frames established by Committee Rules for formal proceedings, it was not possible, as a practical matter, for a formal proceeding on this matter to be completed prior to the end of this Congress. Second, the Federal Election Campaign Act includes a prohibition against conversion of campaign funds to personal use that is comparable to the provision of the House Rules,[1] and thus it is possible that this matter will be remedied by action of the Federal Election Commission.
We also wish to reiterate to all Members that use of campaign funds to pay expenses incurred in attending an event that is entertainment in nature, such as the Grammy Awards, is not permissible. The Committee guidance on the prohibition against converting campaign funds to personal use is set out on pp. 50-61 of the Committee’s Campaign Activity booklet. In particular, under longstanding Committee precedent, the use of campaign funds for a bona fide campaign or political purpose as required by House Rules,
is not established merely because the use of campaign money might result in a campaign benefit as an incident to benefits personally realized by the recipient of such funds . . . .
[T]he Committee believes that any other interpretation and application of [the rule] would open the door to a potentially wide range of abuse and could result in situations where campaign moneys were expended for personal enjoyment, entertainment, or economic well-being of the individual without any clear nexus that the funds so expended achieved any political benefit to the disbursor (campaign organization) of the funds.[2]
With regard to
the trip that Representative Karen McCarthy made to
[1] 2 U.S.C. § 439a(b).
[2] House Comm. on Standards of Official Conduct, Investigation of Financial Transactions of Rep. James Weaver with His Campaign Organization, H. Rep. 99-933, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. 13 (1986) (emphasis in original).
[3]
According to a submission made in behalf of Representative McCarthy, among the
other events that she attended in